|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
5
   |
Posted - 2012.03.19 23:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:My demographic is not represented by the quoted poster, that is my point. My demographic most definitely are not supporters of the folks that enjoy ganking them while they mine in their barges.
Not like you're going to answer, but please tell me how **** exploding is somehow harmful to the industrial profession? The more **** blows up, the more there is to make and sell. Honestly, the mining profession simply CANNOT exist within EVE without **** blowing up. Do you think everyone should only have to buy one Hulk and then call it good?
I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 00:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:you can defeat destroyer ganking with a relatively small number of brain cells
for issler though, those are in short supply: best nerf the catalyst instead
Seems Issler's constituents are part of the AFK crowd.
Thanks for the answer, Issler.
I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 20:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Did you know that once a person makes up their mind the more evidence to the contrary the harder that person commits to it? Look for a book called " You are not so smart" to read more about it. You are clearly dug in and way past that point about this.
I know there's an old adage about a "kettle" that is relevant here. Having trouble remembering it...
I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 22:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Yet to re-iterate: Pandering is the act of expressing one's views in accordance with the likes of a group to which one is attempting to appeal. Something helpful to an election process I would imagine.
I thought I could make some witty comment about Issler doing this herself, but unfortunately all I really know about her is that she is "the miner's friend".
I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 23:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Once the election is over I'll share some insight into how I decided to run my election efforts the way I have. I'll provide a hint, I love studying how RL behavior seems to lose its way once we find ourselves in the Eve 'verse. My efforts for election were serious to be sure but I also took the opportunity to see Eve vs RL first hand.
O hai guise I was trolling all along!
Issler Dainze wrote:But please, keep working on the witty remarks! We could use something to bring some more humor here!
I... I don't even...
I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 20:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:Why do I continue to "troll" your campaign? I just think it is an interesting phenomena how someone can be so out of touch with reality.
Issler is quite possibly the most epic unintentional troll I have ever witnessed. It's quite fascinating.
I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 21:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:At this point what makes you think my blitzner responses are unintentional. Other than thanking folks that supported me all I really have left to do in this thread is to see how wrapped around the axle I can get some of my detractors.
GallowsCalibrator wrote:It's not even an unintentional troll, it's pretty much a full on bout of psychosis. Delusions of grandeur, paranoia? Yeah, someone needs a straitjacket and a comfy padded room here.
Yeah, can't really argue that one...
I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 03:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Interesting conclussion #1:
As CSM got 10,000 vots more than CSM 6, and of those 10,000, 8,500 are rigged alt votes, this means that there's 1,500 actually "new" voters.
You honestly can't believe that someone would voluntarily vote for the Mittani who wasn't a Goon? My industrialist/marketeering friend spent all three account's worth of votes on him because, as he put it, everyone else was pretty much **** or didn't really think about the game in the same way he did. I would have voted for Mittani if Hans hadn't been running; would have been two more independent votes for him.
Face it: The CSM is largely a sounding board for CCP, it doesn't exist to push through your particular "vision" for the game, although I imagine it could be used by CCP to sort of gauge the current priorities of the player base: a vote for Mittani indicates the playerbase would appreciate more null-sec spaceship jackassery.
In the end, to progress this game, null-sec needs some love. **** happening in null means that internet spaceship drama is happening which makes people interested in the game. No one gives a **** about small guys like me and our tiny victories and losses. No one cares about missioners or miners. Null-sec and sovereignty drives the game. This is why a vote for Issler was a wasted vote.
I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 00:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
Carl Thunderthise wrote:If no one cares about miners or missioners then why did candidates supporting them get into the CSM?
How can a vote for Issler be wasted if she gets into the CSM to support us?
I love how you guys just can't bear that she got into the CSM despite the endless prating that she'd never manage.
Do you think people outside of the game sub up because they heard someone talk about mining and missioning? If so, you're ******* stupid; no potential subscribers give a **** about your missioning and mining stories. In order for a PvP game like EVE to grow, you need space drama.
I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 19:22:00 -
[10] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Some of the most popular games today attract players because of things equivalent to "mining and missioning". You are the idiot who is looking through the telescope backwards at the gaming industry.
Sorry folks don't agree with your narrow view of gamers, thank goodness folks in Eve that like those elements of play are making their voice heard because the Eve you'd like will never grow past where it is today.
Subscription stats seem to say otherwise.
Are there any other purely PvP free-market simulations where nearly all of the content is player-generated? if there are, you rarely hear of them. That's what makes EVE special. There are ****-tons of games out there with realistic boob-bouncing barbies you can dress in a myriad of latex fashions and emote in complete safety. Thankfully CCP seems committed to their vision of a harsh universe.
I'd also like to note that I find it quite unbecoming of a CSM member to be calling people idiots, much less blocking them on the forums. You are reinforcing a lot of player's opinion of you as a myopic candidate.
I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
|
|
|
|
| |
|